Cell / Wireless Ban
| Updated October 3, 2009 | |
|
Ban or Warnings against Wireless Technology Governments and organizations that ban or warn against wireless technology American Bird Conservancy and Forest Conservation Council: Brought a lawsuit against the FCC because millions of migratory birds are being disoriented by microwave radiation and crashing into cell towers Amateur Radio Relay League Bio-Effects Committee: “The FCC’s standard does not protect against non-thermal effects.” Australian Democrats: The “explosion in wireless communications technology” is causing widespread illness. Austrian Medical Association: Warns against Wi-Fi, cordless phones, and cell phone use by children. Ballinderry Primary School, Ireland: Removed Wi-Fi to protect the children. Bavaria, Germany: Recommends no Wi-Fi in schools. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): The FCC’s exposure standards are “seriously flawed.” European Environmental Agency: Recommends wireless technology be avoided by vulnerable groups such as children. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): The FCC’s exposure standard “does not address the issue of long-term, chronic exposure to RF fields.” Frankfurt, Germany: Bans Wi-Fi in public schools. Interdisciplinary Society for Environmental Medicine (3000 physicians in Germany): Recommends banning cell phone use by children and banning cell phones and cordless phones in preschools, schools, hospitals, nursing homes, events halls, public buildings and vehicles. International Association of Fire Fighters: Opposes communication antennas on fire stations. International Commission on Electromagnetic Safety (comprised of scientists from 16 nations): Recommends limiting cell phone use by children, teenagers, pregnant women and the elderly. Irish Doctors Environmental Association: Warns that current safety guidelines are “not appropriate.” Karnataka State, India: Bans cell phones in all schools and pre-university colleges. Knowsley, Borough of, England: Bans cell phones in schools. Lakehead University, Ontario: Bans Wi-Fi on campus Madhya Pradesh, India: Bans cell phones in schools by both students and teachers. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): The FCC’s standard is inadequate because it “is based on only one dominant mechanism—adverse health effects caused by body heating.” National Library of France: Removed Wi-Fi and installed only cable connections. Paris, France: Removed Wi-Fi from four libraries. Prebandal Preparatory School, Chichester, England: Removed Wi-Fi from its campus Progressive Librarians Guild: Recommends no wireless technology in libraries. Russian National Committee for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Warns that cell phones are unsafe even for short conversations. Children under 16, pregnant women, epileptics, and people with memory loss, sleep disorders and neurological diseases should never use cell phones. Sainte-Geneviève University, Paris: Removed Wi-Fi from its library. Salzburg, Austria: Bans Wi-Fi in public schools. Sebastopol, California: Broke its contract to install citywide Wi-Fi. Stowe School, Buckinghamshire, England: Removed Wi-Fi from campus. Therold, Ontario: Broke its contract to install citywide Wi-Fi. UK Department of Education: Children under 16 should not use cell phones except in an emergency. University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute: Children should never use a cell phone except in an emergency. Voice (UK Teachers Union): Calls for a ban on Wi-Fi in schools. Ysgol Pantycelyn School, Carmarthenshirem, Wales: Removed Wi-Fi from campus. DOCTORS AND SCIENTISTS CALLING FOR STRICTER REGULATION AND/OR A MORATORIUM ON WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY Vienna Resolution 1998 Salzburg Resolution 2000 Declaration of Alcalá 2002 Catania Resolution 2002 Freiburger Appeal 2002 Bamberger Appeal 2004 Maintaler Appeal 2004 Coburger Appeal 2005 Oberammergauer Appeal 2005 Haibacher Appeal 2005 Pfarrkirchener Appeal 2005 Freienbacher Appeal 2005 Lichtenfelser Appeal 2005 Hofer Appeal 2005 Stockacher Appeal 2005 Helsinki Appeal 2005 Benevento Resolution 2006 Allgäuer Appeal 2006 WiMax Appeal 2006 Appeal of March 23, 2007 Brussels Appeal 2007 Venice Resolution 2008 London Resolution 2007
|
2 Comments »
-
Archives
- September 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (8)
- July 2010 (5)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (7)
- April 2010 (6)
- March 2010 (11)
- February 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (9)
- December 2009 (1)
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (8)
-
Categories
- airline industry
- antenna
- appliances
- awareness
- CA
- cancer
- cell phone
- cell tower
- children
- disease
- economy
- electricity
- electrohypersensitivity
- electromagnetic fields
- electromagnetic radiation
- electronics
- electrosmog
- EMF
- EMR
- environment
- family
- France
- global warming
- greenhouse emissions
- harmonizer
- Health
- mast
- media
- microwave
- mobile
- neutralize
- pollution
- power
- pregnancy
- protect
- public safety
- radiation interference
- schools
- sensativity
- solutions
- teens / tweens
- toddlers
- tower
- USA
- WiFi
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
[...] From EMF Journal: [...]
Pingback by Health Effects of Cell Phone Use | January 7, 2010
[...] what is just the beginning of the great realization that radiation might actually be bad for you: http://emfjournal.com/cell-phone-ban/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1549944/Warning-on-wi-fi-health-risk-to-children.html [...]
Pingback by | SheepRock | February 2, 2010