New EMF Dangers – Type 3 Diabetes and Heart Disease
Offering you, with confidence, another installment of Dr. Mercola’s wisdom and proof of the worsening dangers of EMF.
……………………………………………………..
One symptom of electrohypersensitivity is altered sugar metabolism similar to diabetes. In addition to type 1 and type 2 diabetes, the first video above shows that some diabetics may be electromagnetically sensitive, as shown by changes in their blood sugar when exposed to electromagnetic triggers.
One astonishing finding showed that in diabetic patients who exercised by walking outdoors, blood sugar went down as expected — but in those who exercised on a treadmill, impacted by electromagnetic fields, the blood sugar went up.
Dr. Magda Havas suggests there may not just be a type I diabetes and a type II diabetes, but also a new ‘Type III’ Diabetes related to external environmental factors.
EMF and Your Heart
In the second video above, a study has provided unequivocal evidence that the radiation from a cordless (DECT) phone interferes with your heart. This video provides evidence that electrohypersensitivity is real, is physical, and may be life threatening.
It also shows that non-thermal exposure, at levels well below federal guidelines in most countries (0.3 percent of the 1000 microW/cm2), has biological and health effects.
Sources
International Coalition for an (EMF) Electromagnetic-Safe Planet
Thank you Paul Doyon for your next installment of EMF education.
EMR-Updates August 15th, 2010
Education! Awareness! Support! Action!
(From denial to acceptance, from ignorance to awareness, from apathy to action, from selfishness to compassion.)
- The Internet is Changing the Way We Think (Or Is It That Microwave Radiation is Damaging Our Brains?)
- Smartphone “Deathgrip” Earns Its Name
- Coffee Shops Are Taking WhyFry Off the Menu
- Wireless Phones Cause Cancer, Or Not?
- Parents Bring US Researcher to Address WiFi Concerns in Schools
- Dirty Electricity: Electrification and the Diseases of Civilization
- Local Doctor Shares His View on the Dangers from Electromagnetic Field Radiation
- How Free WiFi Can Shut Down a Restaurant
- Shedding a Little Light on Pollution
- VW/Audi, What Were You Thinking?
- San Francisco Chronicle : Après San Francisco, Portland et Arcata vont adopter l’information concernant l’irradiation (DAS) des téléphones mobiles
- Negligence by a School Board?
- Dangers Accepted Far Too Naively
- WiFi in Public Places
- Parents Suspect WiFi Making Kids Sick
- Understanding a Serious Condition
- You Are My Only Chance: The Appeal to Save James, His Disturbing Story and His Battles
- Town of Hempstead Unite to Keep Our Kids Safe
- WiFi Opponents Make Waves
- Parishioners Protest Cell Phone Antennas in Church Steeple
- Society Is In A Wireless Trance
- More Reasons Why Health Canada Cannot Be Trusted
- Huffman Calls for Health Study on SmartMeters
- Cell Phone Health Hazards: Better Safe Than Sorry
- High Court Judgement in Italy
- Human Electro Hyper Sensitivity — Testimony Part 1
- Mobile Phone Towers A Cause of Worry
- Electrosmog: Ten Ways to Avoid Frying Your Brain
- Misguided Congressman
Local doctor shares his views on dangers from EMF electromagnetic field radiation
by Lillian Cox
Dr. Dan Harper, M.D., was among the first to arrive at the Encinitas City Council meeting the evening of July 21. Carrying a 12-inch stack of medical journal articles about the health risks of electromagnetic field, or EMF, radiation, he was there to speak on behalf of his patient, Michael Schwaebe.
Schwaebe was appealing the placement of WiMAX towers on the site of the former Cabo Grill at Coast Highway 101 and La Costa Avenue. WiMAX is often referred to as “a cell tower on steroids.”
Harper directed his initial remarks to the Sprint Clearwire representatives in attendance when he quoted author Upton Sinclair: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon him not understanding.”
Harper said he was frustrated, but not surprised, that he was unable to complete his presentation.
It would have been illegal.
The wireless industry is protected by Article 704 of the Telecommunications Act signed by President Clinton in 1996 which prohibits arguments of potential health risks from communications towers to be made at public hearings, even if they are legitimate.
Consequently, Schwaebe and his fellow presenters were forced to fall back on a secondary argument, declining property values as a result of placement of the WiMAX towers.
Had Dr. Harper been able to complete his speech, following are points he would have made.
Today, there is an indisputable parallel between the wireless and the tobacco industry, which was not required to post warning labels on cigarette packaging and in advertising until 1965 — after generations of families suffered from respiratory illnesses, cancers and even death due to smoking.
“It took 50 years to get warning labels and they are still selling the product,” Harper wrote in his notes.
In addition, he would have cited studies since the 1970s that show an increase in many cancers of those living within 300 meters of power lines. “Despite being a class 1B carcinogen, they are still building schools and houses on cheap land under power lines,” his notes read.
He would have made the argument that if we post the addresses of sexual predators, why then can’t the location of concealed or stealth cell tower antennaes also be posted.
Harper is a proponent of the need to develop safe neighborhoods for chemically sensitive and EMF-sensitive individuals such Michael Schwaebe by burying powerlines, having no wi-fi in a minimum of a half-mile radius, and no cell towers or pesticides or herbicides sprays in the area.
Finally, Harper would have made an argument that the EMF radiation controversy should actually be a state’s rights issue.
“Even though the FCC has said to ignore the potential health risks to humans and have a 150-day limit on the request to locate their wireless units, you are the wall of protection,” he wrote in his comments to City Council. “This is a federation of states with the states regulating the insurance, medical, dental and mortuary industries. The sheriff of this county has more rights of executive power than the FBI since the sheriff is elected and accountable to the voters.”
So, is he a whack job? Who is Dr. Dan Harper?
He graduated magna cum laud from Baylor College of Medicine, which today ranks No. 13 in research behind Stanford and before UCLA according to www.MedSchool100.com.
He is board certified in holistic medicine and family medicine; and board eligible in emergency medicine with more than 35,000 hours of ER experience.
Before moving to San Diego five years ago he was licensed in Oregon, Wyoming, Montana and Texas. Currently he’s licensed in California and Arizona.
It was changes he noticed in his own system and in his patients in his Solana Beach medical practice that prompted him to investigate environmental factors that impact health here on the coast.
“I did not have problems in Montana since no cell phone towers were there at the time,” he said. “I got here and things were blazin’ hot and people were ill due to the EMFs. There was catatonic schizophrenia, depression, autism, arrhythmias of heart, seizures — all related to EMF exposure. I hit pubmed.com (National Institutes of Health research website) and the Internet to find out why.”
He also took several courses on EMFs offered through the American Academy of Environmental Medicine and studied under Dr. William J. Rea, who is considered one of the fathers of environmental medicine.
Harper learned that San Diego is the second-highest radiated city in the nation, behind Washington, D.C.
“There is 10 million times the background radiation in San Diego compared to 1970,” he said. “It is caused by technology such as cell towers and high-powered transformer lines; military telecommunications; Doppler radar and sonograms shot into earthquake faults. It is also generated by wi-fi communications for computers and games, SDG&E smart meters and transformers on poles and on the ground of local neighborhoods (camouflaged) as green boxes.”
Harper warns that EMF radiation even interferes with meditation at the Self Realization Fellowship.
Ultimately, he says this is leading to a generation of older Americans with pre-senile dementia being cared for by a younger generation with a disproportionate amount of brain cancer.
Beyond our own world, he warns that extremely low frequency, or ELF, radiation used to communicate with submarines is impacting ocean life.
“They interfere with the vestibular apparatus of the brains of the whales,” Harper said. “It messes up their navigation and seems to impair cognition.”
Frustrated, Dr. Harper walked out of the council meeting on July 21 after a woman representing the wireless industry said she had no closing remarks except to say that the city of Encinitas had no legal leg to stand on.
“My heart sank as I saw big business once again put the FCC knife to the throats of the City Council and tell them they would have to sit and watch as they raped and ravaged the community and there was nothing they could do,” he said. “Every citizen is being blasted at a cellular level by this radiation. It may take two or three decades to manifest the cancer or dementia, but it is adversely affecting us all.”
He said that 3 percent of the population is severely and rapidly affected with symptoms such as headaches, confusion, tachycardia, anxiety, skin burning and hives.
“Sixteen percent will only feel the fatigue, insomnia, ‘brain farts’ and memory issues, and the other 81 percent will look at that 19 percent and recommend a good psychiatrist until 30 or 40 years down the road (medical) articles will begin to report that cell phones and wi-fi are more dangerous than cigarettes, asbestos and leaded gasoline put together,” he said.
After members of the Encinitas City Council explained that they had no choice but to deny the appeal, for fear of losing money in legal bills in a futile battle with the federal government, Deputy Mayor Maggie Houlihan called on citizens to write their congressmen and senators to demand that Article 704 be repealed.
The Coast News contacted Rep. Brian Bilbray and his opponent Francine Busby to ask if they would lead such a movement to repeal Article 704. To date, only Bilbray’s office had responded.
Following is the statement from Bilbray’s office: “Congressman Bilbray holds health and safety standards in the highest regard. The standards used in the 1996 Telecom Act to support Article 704 were, at the time, the most stringent health standards available in the United States. A review of these standards has been scheduled by the Federal Communications Commission and Congressman Bilbray will make a determination on further action upon completion of the review.”
Dr. Dan’s Advice
Dr. Dan Harper offers a few tips on how to protect yourself from EMFs:
- Purchase a Trifield Meter to measure EMF radiation in your home. The price is about $125 online.
- In homes, make sure the grounding is done correctly at the junction box of the circuit breaker and of the switch box inside that grounds to the hot water. EMF-sensitive patients have to have a 3-foot section of nonmetallic pipe between their water meter and the house, or all the grounded negative energy comes from neighboring homes into their house and onto them when they shower or do dishes.
- Keep children more than 4 to 5 feet from the front of the TV and away from any alternating current devices such as air filters, computers and stereos.
- Use a large computer monitor, with a corded mouse and key pad that can be set 3 to 4 feet away from the monitor and tower to prevent the strong EMFs from entering your body. Stay away from laptops.
- Turn off electrical equipment at the surge protector when not in use. Turn off routers on wi-fi and computers so EMF radiation is not shot through the house and neighborhood.
- Don’t use a cordless phone. Get a speaker phone or land line.
- Limit cell phone texting and talking, turning off the phone when not in use. If it is kept turned on, it is broadcasting microwaves into the tissues of the person carrying it and those around them. Second-hand radiation is more dangerous than second-hand cigarette smoke in my opinion. The further one gets from the cell tower, the stronger the cell phone blasts into the tissues trying to reach the tower. The closer one gets to the tower, the more the tower blasts the person there, whether they have a phone on or not.
- Bluetooth phones triple the amount of negative energy entering your body.
- Finally, don’t live near a cell tower unless you have your life insurance policy and your medical insurance covers cancer, autoimmunity, dementia (including Alzheimer’s and presenile dementia), heart disease, diabetes, and a large number of so called chronic diseases that have been shown to increase in the presence of harmful EMFs at low doses.
Kids, schools and WiFi, not a good combo

“These kids are getting sick at school but not at home.” Parents And Teachers Demanding That Schools Dump WiFi
Seek protection for your Children; you do it at home, why not at School? http://BioMapped.com
EMR-Updates IC-ESP
Thank you Paul Doyon for yet another explosive education…
International Coalition for an Electromagnetic-Safe Planet (IC-ESP)
Education! Awareness! Support! Action!
(From denial to acceptance, from ignorance to awareness, from apathy to action, from selfishness to compassion.)
- Mayoral Candidate Plans to Cut Waves
- Electromagnetic Fields Linked to Diabetic Disasters
- Report: Laptop, WiFi Radiation May Affect Male Fertility
- 4G WiMax to Reach 120 Million in USA by End of Year
- Are Smart Meters Dangerous, too?
- Fiorito: Our Heads in a Microwave Oven
- What Your Smartphone App. Doesn’t Say: It’s Watching
- Pulse-Modulated Emissions from Masts and Mobile Phones
- Farmland Bird Numbers in England Fall to Record Low
- Laptops in Backpacks
- Cell Towers Have an Effect on Property Values
- EHS Refugee Zone: “How it works”
- Decline in Insect Populations
- Depleted Uranium Litigation and the Health Council of the Netherlands
- Vote for Martin
- Burnaby Hospital — With Its Cell Tower on Its Roof — Has Among the Highest Death Rates in Canada
- Your Boxspring Might Be Acting as a Radiation Attracting, Cancer Causing, Antenna
- Dear Mayor Green, from Dr. Reese Halter
- A Basic Summary of the Neurological Effects of Radio-frequency Sickness
- Greenair Technology?
- Cancer and the Depleted Uranium Controversy
- New Law May Slow Cell Phone Cancer Epidemic
- Dear Ambassador Nicolaos Matsis
- Body Scanner Invades More Than Privacy
- Burbank ACTION (Against Cell Towers in Our Neighborhood)
- Decreased Real Estate Values
- The Procrustean Approach Is Now Online
- Cancer Mortality Near Air Force Bases
- Household Appliances Linked to Breast Cancer
- Electromagnetic Sensitivity Warning for DDC
- Restore the People’s Freedom to Reject Cell Towers on Health Grounds
- Modernity Catching Up With Barefoot Indonesian Tribe
- The Ombudsman asks for a law that would limit radiation
- Safe Radiation An Oxymoron
- WiFi Researcher Has Great Track Record
EMF-Omega-News 14. August 2010
Grateful for yet another detailed weekly summation from:
Dear Sir, Madam, Ladies and gentlemen, dear friends, for your information.
Best regards,
Klaus Rudolph
Citizens’ Initiative Omega
<http://www.next-up.org/Newsoftheworld/OmegaNews.php>http://www.next-up.org/Newsoftheworld/OmegaNews.php
http://www.mastsanity.org/index.php?option=com_newsfeeds&task=view&feedid=1&Itemid=52
http://mast-victims.org/index.php?content=news&action=view&type=newsitem&id=2569
http://weepnews.blogspot.com/search/label/Omega%20News
Member of the Buergerwelle Germany (incorporated society) Protectorate Union of the Citizens and Initiatives for the Protection against Electrosmog http://www.buergerwelle.de/cms/content/view/57/70/
Updated 14aug10
High Court Judgement in Italy
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1291/
Vanished insects hint at potential bio-catastrophe
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1290/
Diseases of Civilization Linked to Electricity
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1303/
Dangers accepted far too naively
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1299/
Local doctor shares his views on dangers from electromagnetic radiation
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1302/
Stricter guidelines soon for mobile radiation
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1289/
Power fears raised with council
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1288/
Parishioners protest plan for cellphone antennas in Ridgefield church
steeple
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1292/
Wireless phones cause cancer or other maladies
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1309/
Wi-Fi opponents make waves
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1295/
Residents in Chafford make documentary for fight against mast
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1300/
Troon residents protest against giant phone mast
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/1301/
Next-up News Nr 1383
http://sharenews.twoday.net/stories/6458093/
Next-up News Nr 1384
http://sharenews.twoday.net/stories/6463859/
News from Mast Sanity
Omega-News Collection 14. August 2010
Are Your Mattress And Bedframe Killing You With EMF?
by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 08. 2.10

The Robinsons model the latest in tinfoil pyjamas
Forget the tinfoil hat, it is time for tinfoil pyjamas. Scientific American tells us that the bed frames and box springs in most American beds are half the wavelength of TV and FM signals and are acting as antennae, causing skin and breast cancers on victims’ left sides, which are usually right were the maximum strength of the EMF would be.

How to make a tinfoil hat: instructions here
R. Douglas Fields, Ph. D, writes in Scientific American about the Swedish study by Örjan Hallberg of Hallberg Independent Research in Sweden and Olle Johansson of The Karolinska Institute in Sweden, that describes the effect:
As we sleep on our coil-spring mattresses, we are in effect sleeping on an antenna that amplifies the intensity of the broadcast FM/TV radiation. Asleep on these antennas, our bodies are exposed to the amplified electromagnetic radiation for a third of our life spans. As we slumber on a metal coil-spring mattress, a wave of electromagnetic radiation envelops our bodies so that the maximum strength of the field develops 75 centimeters above the mattress in the middle of our bodies. When sleeping on the right side, the body’s left side will thereby be exposed to field strength about twice as strong as what the right side absorbs.
The author notes that the rate of breast cancer in Japan is a lot lower than in the west, and attributes this to the fact that they do not sleep on mattresses, and their TVs operate on a different frequency.
A commenter at Apartment Therapy noted that study co-author Ollie Johansson was awarded the Misleader of the Year Award in 2004 for his work in EMF. The citation includes:
Olle Johansson receives the award as one of the most prominent representatives of the far too many scientists who, to draw attention to themselves and funding for their own activities, disseminate worry among the public in mass media by presenting unsubstantiated hypotheses as established facts…..Olle Johansson insinuates that a large number of diseases such as cancer, blood pressure problems, asthma, allergies and sleep disorders, may be caused by electromagnetic fields. He has also come to the conclusion that malignant melanomas may be caused by TV- and FM-transmissions. A few years ago Johansson received particular attention after he claimed that brain damage, and specifically mad cow disease could be caused by the use of mobile phones.
But then again, everyone is just so certain whenever we write about the possible dangers of EMF, that all those cellphone towers and cellphones, microwave ovens and electric blankets, not to mention routers and wifi are perfectly harmless. How can they be so sure?
More in TreeHugger on EMF
Should Cell Phone Towers Be Put on Residential Buildings?
Are Hybrids an EMF Health Risk?
EMF: Richard Box’s Graphic Demonstrations
A Univerisity without WifI
Spray-on Defense from WiFi and Cellphones
New Study Proves EMF Affects Living Things, Discovers Electro-bonsai Effect
EMR-Updates July 28th, 2010
Thank you Paul Doyon for the immense amount of time and energy you voluntarily devote to educating the world …CSea and our readers.
_______
International Coalition for an Electromagnetic-Safe Planet (IC-ESP)
Education! Awareness! Support! Action!
(From denial to acceptance, from ignorance to awareness, from apathy to action, from selfishness to compassion.)
- Smart Meters More Dangerous Than Anticipated
- How Smart Is Brain Cancer?
- Danish Illness Associated With GSM Mobile Phones
- Top Doctor`s Mobile Phone Radiation Warning to Children
- Text but Don`t Talk on Mobile, Children Are Told
- Children Urged to “Text, Not Call” by Medical Chief
- Local Woman Fights Wireless Industry to Reduce Health Risks
- Letter to BC Hydro by Art Joyce
- Smart Meter Causing Harm to Ontario Resident
- Smart Meters Questioned in Scotts Valley California
- Yale Study Shows Electrical Fields Influence Brain Activity
- Judge Won`t Bar Use of Electronics
- The Effects of Radiation in the Cause of Cancer
- Is Your Office Making You Sick?
- Are Cell Phones the New Cigarette?
- Vatican Masts Blamed for Causing Cancer in Children
- Parents Question WiFi
- Smart Beam Antenna Optimization
- Report Suggests Radiation from Vatican Radio Increases Cancer Risk
- RF Effects on Aspen Trees
- The Possible Effects of Electromagnetic and Radio Frequency Radiation
- No Class at Clark Elementary School?
- Health Fears Lead Schools to Dismantle Wireless Networks
- The Day After Interphone
- Pick of the Week: Origins of 1966 U.S. Safety Standards for Microwave Radiation
- Vogue: Mobile Phones and Health
- Letter to the Ministry of Health Canada
- Is there a link between cell phone technology and Brain Tumour?:Findings of the The INTERPHONE Brain Tumor Study
- First published review of 10 cellular antenna studies finds adverse health effects
- Thesis Shows Correlation Between Deaths from Cancer and Location of Cellular Antennas
- Take Care When Deciding Locations for Cell Phone Towers
- Electromagnetic fields: mechanism, cell signaling, other bioprocesses, toxicity, radicals, antioxidants and beneficial effects
Trade group sues to stop SF from posting cell phone radiation emissions
This is huge; thank you Angela Flynn for bring to our attention.
——-
Mayor Gavin Newsom’s idea to require stores to post how much radio frequency energy is emitted by cell phones hit a legal snag today.
The industry trade group CTIA — The Wireless Association filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in San Francisco.
The ordinance, “misleads consumers by creating the false impression that the FCC’s standards are insufficient and that some phones are ‘safer’ than others,” the group said in a press release.
The FCC has adopted limits for safe exposure to radiation, which are calculated in terms of a unit called the Specific Absorption Rate that signifies the amount of radio frequency energy a person absorbs into his or her body and brain when talking on a cell phone.
Newsom expected his legislation would be challenged and told the Insider’s Heather Knight in December that “If we prevail, and I believe we will prevail, other cities will follow suit.”
The FCC requires that cell phone manufacturers ensure their phones are at or below a SAR level of 1.6 watts per kilogram of body tissue to be legally sold in this country. Some phones emit as little as 0.2 watts per kilogram.
The ordinance, which was passed by the Board of Supervisors, would make San Francisco the first city in the nation to require cell phone retailers to display the SAR level next to each phone. Retailers would also have to provide information about what SAR values mean.
UPDATE: Newsom said in a statement that he’s “disappointed” with the legal challenge. “This law is not an attack on the wireless industry or their products…This is a modest, common sense measure which merely takes information already made available by these companies and makes it more accessible and easier to find by the point-of-sale consumer.”
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/cityinsider/detail?entry_id=68570&tsp=1#ixzz0uYVNTaTY
Are Cells the New Cigarettes?
The great cosmic joke would be to find out definitively that the advances we thought were blessings — from the hormones women pump into their bodies all their lives to the fancy phones people wait in line for all night — are really time bombs.
Just as parents now tell their kids that, believe it or not, there was a time when nobody knew that cigarettes and tanning were bad for you, those kids may grow up to tell their kids that, believe it or not, there was a time when nobody knew how dangerous it was to hold your phone right next to your head and chat away for hours.
We don’t yet really know the physical and psychological impact of being slaves to technology. We just know that technology is a narcotic. We’re living in the cloud, in a force field, so afraid of being disconnected and plunged into a world of silence and stillness that even if scientists told us our computers would make our arms fall off, we’d probably keep typing.
San Francisco just became the first city in the country to pass legislation making cellphone retailers display radiation levels. The city’s Board of Supervisors voted 10 to 1 in favor. The one against, the Democrat Sean Elsbernd, said afterward: “It’s a slippery slope. I can go on Google right now and find you a study that says there’s a problem with the Starbucks you’re drinking.”
Different phone models emit anywhere from 0.2 watts per kilogram of body tissue to 1.6 watts, the legal limit. The amount of radio frequency energy seeping into the body and brain is measured by a unit called the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR).
“You see all these kids literally glued to their phones,” Gavin Newsom, the mayor of San Francisco, told me. “And candidly, my wife was pregnant and on her cellphone nonstop. So I dusted off some studies and started doing research.
“That’s when I discovered that companies who make cellphones are already required to disclose that information to the federal government, and that it exists but somewhere on someone’s Web page on the 88th page.” Why not underscore it, he thought, by alerting consumers at the store, putting the SAR level in the same font as the phone price?
His alarmed advisers, accustomed to seeing the sleek Newsom diving into bold stands without calculating the potential blowback — as with gay marriage — told him to focus on jobs and the economy.
“They said: ‘There you go again. They’re going to mock you. It’s going to be another sideshow,’ ” he recalled. But stroking his baby daughter’s soft head and reading new studies on the vulnerability of children’s thinner skulls to radiation, he persevered.
One Swedish study that followed young people who began using cells as teenagers for 10 years calculated a 400 percent increase in brain tumors. But as Nathaniel Rich recently pointed out in Harper’s, studies about cellphones’ carcinogenic potential all contradict one another, including those involving children.
When Newsom proposed the bill, telecommunications lobbyists went to the mattresses, as did hoteliers, who feared losing convention business.
He said that lobbyists from Washington made it clear that they would invoke “the nuclear option” and come down “like a ton of bricks.”
“This is tobacco money, oil money,” he said. “But these guys from D.C. do not know me because that has exactly the opposite effect. Shame on them, to threaten the city. It’s about as shortsighted as one could get in terms of a brand.”
Months before the bill passed, he read me part of a letter that Marriott sent him: “CTIA — The Wireless Association, which is scheduled to hold a major convention here in October 2010, has already contacted us about canceling their event if the legislation moves forward. They also have told us that they are in contact with Apple, Cisco, Oracle and others who are heavily involved in the industry, as you know, about not holding future events in your city for the same reason.”
Sure enough, when the bill passed Tuesday, CTIA issued a petulant statement that after 2010, it would relocate its annual three-day fall exhibition, with 68,000 exhibitors and attendees and “$80 million” in business, away from San Francisco.
“Since our bill is relatively benign,” Newsom said, “it begs the question, why did they work so hard and spend so much money to kill it? I’ve become more fearful, not less, because of their reaction. It’s like BP. Shouldn’t they be doing whatever it takes to protect their global shareholders?”
So now we have Exhibit No. 1,085 illustrating the brazenness of Big Business.
They should be sending Mayor Newsom a bottle of good California wine for caring about whether kids’ brains get fried, not leaving him worried about whether they’ll avenge themselves in his campaign for lieutenant governor.
He’s resigned to that possibility, just as he is to his own addiction. “I love my iPhone,” he said cheerfully.
Go to Columnist Page »
SOURCE: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/27/opinion/27dowd.html
-
Archives
- September 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (8)
- July 2010 (5)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (7)
- April 2010 (6)
- March 2010 (11)
- February 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (9)
- December 2009 (1)
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (8)
-
Categories
- airline industry
- antenna
- appliances
- awareness
- CA
- cancer
- cell phone
- cell tower
- children
- disease
- economy
- electricity
- electrohypersensitivity
- electromagnetic fields
- electromagnetic radiation
- electronics
- electrosmog
- EMF
- EMR
- environment
- family
- France
- global warming
- greenhouse emissions
- harmonizer
- Health
- mast
- media
- microwave
- mobile
- neutralize
- pollution
- power
- pregnancy
- protect
- public safety
- radiation interference
- schools
- sensativity
- solutions
- teens / tweens
- toddlers
- tower
- USA
- WiFi
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS